![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

|
![]()
The standard methods
of weld line prediction fail when the gas-assist technique is used and weld
lines develop in thick-walled areas. Low flow resistance in the gas channels
leads to increased gas bubble propogation. At the end of the melt filling
phase when one flow front lags slightly behind the other, the cushion of
melt in front of the gas bubble on the lagging side will be smaller than
the cushion of melt in front of the other bubble. This means that the flow
resistance of the melt will become smaller too and the flow front will advance
at a correspondingly fast pace. This leads to a shift in the position of
the weld line. The expected weld line position is shown in the diagram below.
Inevitably, this will lead to an accumulation of material at the end of
flow.
The designer should avoid a thick-walled gas-assist injection molding ring
(exterior car mirrors are a typical example). The best alternative is a
balanced separation of the two gas channels by means of a thin-walled area
without a gas bubble. The melt flow can be balanced with the aid of rheological
computation programs suited for gas-assist injection molding.

Click in the graphic area below to view an actual mold filling which demonstrates the unpredictable location of the weld line. The video shows four different mold fillings, one of which is in slow motion.